Access and technical foundations
Crawl access, indexing signals, page responses, sitemaps, mobile usability and performance on the pages included in your scope.
HOW WE ASSESS YOUR WEBSITE
An evidence-led assessment of how your website can be found, understood and represented in search and AI answers. ARC-100 combines technical checks, documented answer testing and human review to turn findings into a practical action plan.
Public methodology · Updated October 7, 2026
Crawl access, indexing signals, page responses, sitemaps, mobile usability and performance on the pages included in your scope.
Whether services, locations, customer questions and useful answers are clear, accessible and supported by reliable information.
Relevant schema, consistent business facts, service and location information, and connections between your website and public profiles.
Authorship, qualifications, contact details, policies and verifiable proof of work. We distinguish supported claims from statements that need evidence.
Mentions, recommendations, citations, accuracy and competitor appearances in an agreed set of prompts and platforms. The report states exactly what was tested.
Relevant public-facing privacy and accuracy signals, agreed AI-use controls and a practical plan for measuring changes. This is not a penetration test or legal compliance certification.
Confirm your business goals, services, locations, pages, competitors, platforms and access permissions before testing.
Combine crawl and page diagnostics with manual inspection. Record URLs, observations, dates and supporting captures; check findings in their business context.
Use agreed discovery and comparison prompts. Record the exact prompt, platform, available model or mode, date, location assumptions, answer and cited sources. Separate branded questions from unbranded discovery.
Apply the agreed ARC-100 rubric, check conflicting signals and identify anything that could not be tested. Explain the evidence and limitations behind the result.
Provide recommended actions, expected benefit, estimated effort and dependencies. Agree who will implement changes and how a later check will compare results.
The paid ARC-100 score summarizes findings within the agreed audit scope and methodology version. It is a diagnostic measure, not a probability that ChatGPT will recommend your business, a search ranking or a revenue forecast. Your report explains the applicable categories and the evidence supporting the result.
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE — NOT A CLIENT RESULT
Scope, report depth, platforms and deliverables are confirmed before work starts. Implementation and ongoing monitoring are separate services unless your agreement includes them.
No. ARC-100 is AI Readiness Canada’s assessment framework, not a certification issued or endorsed by Google, OpenAI or a regulator.
The automated website score alone does not establish live recommendation visibility. Read the snapshot’s stated test scope; any observed AI answer evidence must identify the platform, prompt and date.
No. A score describes the assessed signals. Search rankings, citations and recommendations are controlled by the platforms and cannot be guaranteed.
Yes. The roadmap can guide your existing team or agency. Implementation is scoped separately.
Client-specific evidence and reports are shared within the agreed engagement. A public case study requires client permission. This page explains the approach without exposing proprietary checklists or weighting rules.